Optimal bounds for sums of arithmetic functions
Heilbronn Number Theory Seminar
27th March 2026, 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
Fry Building, G.07
Let $A(s) = \sum_n a_n n^{-s}$ be a Dirichlet series with meromorphic continuation. Say we are given information on the poles of $A(s)$ with $|\Im s| \leq T$ for some large constant $T$. What is the best way to use such finite spectral data to give explicit estimates for sums $\sum_{n\leq x} a_n$?
The problem of giving explicit bounds on the Mertens function $M(x) = \sum_{n\leq x} \mu(n)$ illustrates how open this basic question was. Bounding $M(x)$ might seem equivalent to estimating $\psi(x) = \sum_{n\leq x} \Lambda(n)$ or the number of primes $\leq x$. However, we have long had fairly good explicit bounds on prime counts, while bounding $M(x)$ remained a notoriously stubborn problem.
We prove a sharp, general result on sums $\sum_{n\leq x} a_n n^{-\sigma}$ for $a_n$ bounded, giving a optimal way to use information on the poles of $A(s)$ with $|\Im s|\leq T$ and no data on the poles above.
Our bounds on $M(x)$ are stronger than previous ones by many orders of magnitude. We also give a sharp result on such sums for a_n non-negative and not necessarily bounded, and apply it to obtain optimal bounds on psi(x)-x given finite verifications of RH.
Our proofs mixe a Fourier-analytic approach in the style of Wiener--Ikehara with contour-shifting, using optimal approximants of Beurling--Selberg type as in (Graham--Vaaler, 1981) and (Carneiro--Littmann, 2013). While our approach does not depend on existing explicit work in number theory, our method has an important step in common with work on another problem by (Ramana–Ramare, 2020).

Comments are closed.